Figure 1: Comparison of theoretical and observed convergence behavior for the \(L_2((0,T);L_2(\Gamma))\)-error with respect to \(h\), \(\tau\), and \(m\). The left and center plots display the convergence rates in \(h\) and \(\tau\), respectively, on a \(\text{log}_{10}\)โ\(\text{log}_{10}\) scale, while the right plot shows the exponential decay in \(m\) on a semi-\(\text{log}_{e}\) scale, with \(m\) plotted on a square-root scale. Dashed lines indicate the theoretical rates, and solid lines represent the observed error curves. The legend below each plot shows the value of \(\alpha\) along with the corresponding theoretical (โtheoโ), and observed (โobsโ) rates for each case.
Figure 2: Comparison of theoretical and observed convergence behavior for the \(L_2((0,T);L_2(\Gamma))\)-error with respect to \(h\) on a \(\text{log}_{10}\)โ\(\text{log}_{10}\) scale. Dashed lines indicate the theoretical rates, and solid lines represent the observed error curves. The legend below each plot shows the value of \(\alpha\) along with the corresponding theoretical (โtheoโ), and observed (โobsโ) rates for each case.
Figure 3: Comparison of theoretical and observed convergence behavior for the \(L_2((0,T);L_2(\Gamma))\)-error with respect to \(\tau\) on a \(\text{log}_{10}\)โ\(\text{log}_{10}\) scale. Dashed lines indicate the theoretical rates, and solid lines represent the observed error curves. The legend below each plot shows the value of \(\alpha\) along with the corresponding theoretical (โtheoโ), and observed (โobsโ) rates for each case.
Figure 4: Comparison of theoretical and observed convergence behavior for the \(L_2((0,T);L_2(\Gamma))\)-error with respect to \(m\) on a semi-\(\text{log}_{e}\) scale, with \(m\) plotted on a square-root scale. Dashed lines indicate the theoretical rates, and solid lines represent the observed error curves. The legend below each plot shows the value of \(\alpha\) along with the corresponding theoretical (โtheoโ), and observed (โobsโ) rates for each case.